Preventing Impaired Driving

Key points

  • There are multiple known effective measures for preventing alcohol-impaired driving, including laws, enforcement, and technology.
  • Less is known about effective measures for the prevention of drug-impaired driving compared to alcohol-impaired driving, but there are promising strategies such as standardized toxicological testing of drivers.

State and community prevention

Effective measures for preventing alcohol-impaired driving include:

Laws and enforcement

  • Actively implementing and enforcing lower BAC limits.1
    • Globally, most high-income countries have BAC laws set at 0.05 g/dl or lower,23 and these laws are effective for reducing crashes involving alcohol-impaired drivers and deaths from these crashes.1 These laws serve as a general deterrent and reduce alcohol-impaired driving, even among drivers who are at highest risk of impaired driving.1
    • Utah implemented a 0.05 g/dL BAC law in 2018; the other 49 states and the District of Columbia (DC) have a BAC limit of 0.08 g/dL.45 Utah's 0.05 g/dL BAC law was associated with an 18% reduction in the motor vehicle crash death rate per mile driven in the first year after it went into effect. The new law was also associated with lower alcohol involvement in crashes.4
    • An estimated 1,790 lives could be saved each year if all states adopted a 0.05 g/dl BAC limit.6
  • Maintaining minimum legal drinking age laws and zero tolerance laws for drivers younger than 21 in all states.178
  • Requiring alcohol ignition interlocks for all people convicted of alcohol-impaired driving, including first-time offenders.9 Additionally, incorporating alcohol use disorder assessment and treatment into interlock programs shows promise in reducing repeat offenses even after interlocks are removed.10
  • Implementing publicized sobriety checkpoints711 and high-visibility saturation patrols.7

Screening, assessment, and treatment

  • Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment can be beneficial for people who drink alcohol excessively but do not have . Brief interventions often involve assessing readiness, motivators, and barriers for behavior change. These types of interventions can also be delivered through technologies such as computers, cell phones, and tablets.11213
    • ÐÇ¿ÕÓéÀÖ¹ÙÍø's Alcohol Screening Tool can be used by adults to assess their drinking and create a personal change plan.
  • Implementing alcohol use disorder assessment and treatment, if needed, for people who are convicted of alcohol-impaired driving.17

Population-level strategies

  • Supporting affordable alternative transportation options, such as nighttime and weekend public transportation hours.1
  • Using strategies that increase the price of alcohol and make it less convenient to buy, such as increasing alcohol taxes and regulating alcohol outlet density. These strategies are effective for reducing drinking to impairment and also help to prevent alcohol-impaired driving.1141516
  • Implementing programs that combine prevention efforts (such as sobriety checkpoints and limiting access to alcohol) with the involvement of a community coalition or task force.17

Technology

  • recommends that all new vehicles should be equipped with technology that prevents or limits the vehicle from operating if the driver is impaired by alcohol.18 The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law calls on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requiring all new passenger vehicles to come equipped with advanced technology for the prevention of impaired driving.19 This technology has significant potential to reduce impaired driving fatalities.1

Keep Reading: What Works: Strategies to Reduce or Prevent Alcohol-Impaired Driving

Less is known about effective measures for the prevention of drug-impaired driving compared to alcohol-impaired driving.7

However, the following strategies are promising:

Enforcement of drug-impaired driving laws7

  • and law enforcement officers with training are important to the enforcement of these laws. DREs are officers with specialized training who can recognize signs of impairment by alcohol and/or other substances.7

Standardized toxicological testing of drivers

  • Should include testing for both those stopped for suspicion of impaired driving and those involved in fatal crashes.2021
Print
Content Source:
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
  1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Accelerating Progress to Reduce Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities. . Negussie Y, Geller A, Teutsch SM, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press(US); 2018.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). . Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
  3. Yellman MA, Sauber-Schatz EK. Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths — United States and 28 Other High-Income Countries, 2015 and 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(26):837–843. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7126a1
  4. Thomas FD, Blomberg R, Darrah J, Graham L, Southcott T, Dennert R, Taylor E, Treffers R, Tippetts S, McKnight S, Berning A. . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; February 2022.
  5. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI). . Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute; 2022.
  6. Fell JC, Scherer M. . Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41:2128–2139. doi:10.1111/add.12365
  7. Venkatraman V, Richard CM, Magee K, Johnson K. . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); July 2021.
  8. Guide to Community Preventive Services. . 2021.
  9. Guide to Community Preventive Services. . 2021.
  10. Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Bergen G, Grosz M, Marques P. . Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(9):1953–1960. doi:10.1111/acer.13149
  11. Guide to Community Preventive Services. . 2021.
  12. Tansil KA, Esser MB, Sandhu P, Reynolds JA, Elder RW, Williamson RS, Chattopadhyay SK, Bohm MK, Brewer RD, McKnight-Eily LR, Hungerford DW, Toomey TL, Hingson RW, Fielding JE; Community Preventive Services Task Force. . Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):801–811. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.013
  13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. . U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; November 2018.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (ÐÇ¿ÕÓéÀÖ¹ÙÍø). Preventing Excessive Alcohol Use. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022.
  15. Guide to Community Preventive Services. . 2021.
  16. Guide to Community Preventive Services. . 2021.
  17. Shults RA, Elder RW, Nichols J, Sleet DA, Compton R, Chattopadhyay SK; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. . Am J Prev Med.2009;37(4):360–371. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.005
  18. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). . Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board. 2022.
  19. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  20. D'Orazio AL, Mohr ALA, Chan-Hosokawa A, Harper C, Huestis MA, Limoges JF, Miles AK, Scarneo CE, Kerrigan S, Liddicoat LJ, Scott KS, Logan BK. . J Anal Toxicol. 2021;45(6):529–536. doi:10.1093/jat/bkab064
  21. Azofeifa A, Rexach-Guzmán BD, Hagemeyer AN, Rudd RA, Sauber-Schatz EK. Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana and Illicit Drugs Among Persons Aged ≥16 Years — United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(50):1153–1157.